colonel_yuri wrote:

During the 1960s, as part of their new psychotronic superweapon project, American particle physicists have started to systematically investigate the physics of electron and muon pairs, quantum, electrodynamics,

Do you have an information source that connects these advances with "their new psychotronic superweapon project"?


Kevin Alexander

The production and decay of photon-like particles, and searching for new particles which decay to electron or muon pairs. These types of experiments are characterized by the need for a high-intensity incident flux, for high rejection against a large number of unwanted background events, and at the same time the need for a detector with good mass resolution.

In order to search for new particles at a higher mass, experiments conducted at the Brookhaven National Laboratory lead to the discovery of new totally unpredicted heavy particles. Since then a whole family of new particles has been found, including: pions, kaons, eta mesons, D mesons, psi/J particles, upsilon particles.

The tau particle is a heavy electron-like particle discovered in the 1970s by the team of American particle physicist Martin Perl at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Soon after its production the tau particle decays into various collections of more stable particles. About 86% of the time the decay involves just one charged particle. The one-charged-particle event is made up of four major modes of decay as well as a collection of other events. The four main types of decay are denoted rho, pi, e and mu.

Related Links:


Tau decay physics




House Bill 4513 would define a “harmful electronic or electromagnetic device” as a device that does, or that was designed to, emit or radiate an electronic or electromagnetic pulse, current, beam, signal, or microwave intended to cause harm to others or cause damage to, destroy, or disrupt any electronic or telecommunications system or device including, but not limited to, a computer, computer network, or computer system.

House Bill 4514 would make it a crime to manufacture, deliver, possess, transport, place, use, or release a harmful electronic or electromagnetic device for an unlawful purpose. Penalties range from a 15 year felony with a $10,000 fine to a life sentence without parole and a $40,000 fine depending on the injuries sustained by the victims.




On Science and Mind Control

I have observed the phenomenon of microwave mind control for over ten years with considerable interest. For the purposes of this post, I consider microwave mind control to be consistent with Julianne McKinney's classic article on the subject, or any of Harlan Girard's articles. Although I am not myself a victim, I have communicated with numerous self-proclaimed "mind control victims" and have come to the conclusion that there is probably a substantial amount of truth in their claims and that they merit scientific investigation. The question of scientific investigation gets at the heart of the matter of the true nature of this problem. Consequently there is a need to dispassionately address the matter of the interplay of science and mind control in order to recognize the scope of the possible problem.

In order to simplify the discussion, I shall use the definition of the word science as found in my 1985 _American Heritage Dictionary_to wit science just means "to know." By such a broad definition I am sure not to offend members of disciplines less rigorous than others. Take for example the science of psychiatry (as a branch of medical science). It is indisputable that its practitioners do know a great deal of phenomenology pertaining to what can go wrong with the human mind. However that their methods of distinguishing true organic brain disorders from psychological abuse alleged by the self-professed mind control victims are valid is false. Indeed, psychiatry has never acknowledged that there may be any truth to such claims. Yet psychiatry has no cause and effect explanation for what it claims to identify as "schizophrenia." Which is obvious from the standpoint of present neuroscientific knowledge of the brain. To even begin to understand what the psychiatrist alleges to be "mental illness" neuroscience would have to have a successful theory of the brain which it simply doesn't- in fact the present state of knowledge of the human brain is not even 5% of completely understanding it. The so-called dopamine theory of schizophrenia is only a statistical correlation between presence/absence of certain neurotransmitters and the clinician's subjective identification of "symptoms"- which as rigorously defined scientific terms are useless. It is no surprise therefore that Mr. Mosher resigned in 1999 as the head of the American Psychiatric Association for what he politely termed "quasiscientific" research on the part of his colleagues.

But if psychiatry has a physical model which purports to "explain" schizophrenia- though it remains the only significant "theory" this profession can muster after almost 40 years since its serendipitous discovery- psychology is even more hard pressed to give any cause and effect explanation at all for what it claims to understand about the science of mind and brain. Anyone who has read a good book on fundamental neuroscience, such as Churchland's _Neurophilosophy_, will appreciate the fact that psychology is not even able to define its terms sufficiently to even begin a reduction of mind to the underlying substrate of brain. However a deductive cause and effect explanation for how higher cortical processes translate into "thoughts" is not the limit of the purview of the psychologisist. Far from it, although the other side, the inductive correlationist explanations are not mainstays of psychology either. The successes of psychology are the many and myriad practical ones, some of which we are aware of from our daily lives. To be sure, like psychiatry, psychology holds a very powerful position in modern society.

Without boring the reader with the usual anecdote of the exploits of the UCLA Professor of psychology Jolyon West and his murder of the elephant with LSD, we can point to a few very significant findings which psychology has made as being of direct relevance to mind control. Although buried in the annals of experimentation behind more "ethical" studies, the one by Stanley Milgram goes a long way towards explaining why and how the liberal elites of society seem to be covering for the U.S. government's top secret mind control project. In this study performed in the 60's, volunteers were directed to "teach" subjects via a bit of negative reinforcement, to wit the students were shocked electrically if they did not learn well enough. Unbeknownst to the volunteers (the true subjects of the experiment) the shocks weren't real and the students were actors. The volunteers were told to increase the shock level to visibly quite painful levels in order to better aid the learning process. Although they would initially balk at the prospect of harming the student, they soon became inured to the plaintive crys of the students since obedience to authority was more important in the minds of the experimental subjects than personal responsibility. While shattering the Allied propaganda myth about that "uniquely 'good German'" trait of obedience to authority, this experiment also points to how the U.S. government could get full cooperation from most of the citizenry in the torture of the alleged mind control victims. For almost all victims of microwave mind control claim to be psychologically harassed 24/7 by what they term "street theatre" (c.f. McKinney's "Microwaves and Mind Control" for an explanation of this), by seemingly ordinary everyday people, whether they are the neighbors, the victim's coworkers, or just passers by on the street. Milgram's experiment explains how these ordinary people could be enlisted to torture their victims: obedience to authority is a fundamental trait of the human biped; it's a known fact of scientific psychology.

Indeed, this also sheds light on how such a vast conspiracy could be happening in America as well in other parts of the English speaking world (it is also known to happen in Germany and Japan, not coincidentally two countries with extensive U.S. Military Base presence in this post cold war era; also to be complete there are reports of extensive microwave mind control operations in Russia- it wasn't for nothing that George Orwell modeled his book _1984_ on the Soviet Union, which apparently socialist America is beginning to resemble in some respects all to clearly). The operational term is "compartmentalization", which means that lower level operatives don't get told anything more about the operation than what their actions are to be- simply obey and you may be rewarded with an attractive female (or male if you are female) companion for the night or longer, you could get a raise, a promotion, a fat grant proposal approved, etc. Next on the list of findings of psychology relevant to mind control is one which every student of psychology knows well, and not coincidentally perhaps seems to provide a good explanation for the psychological harassment component of mind control.

Anyone who's studied a fair amount of psychology can explain what the "learned helplesness model" is. For those who don't know, a simple example suffices to explain it: put a dog in a cage, and attach all manner of noise makers, mechanical pounding devices, emitters of recorded sounds, on or near the cage. Let the adverse stimuli be connected to a central controller interfaced by a personal computer programmed to activate the stimuli at random. Now after maybe one hour of initial treatment with the cage door closed, you open the cage door, the dog will step out and be free. After several hours of this the dog might take a while to exit the cage when the door is opened- it will be cowering helplessly in the corner, whining softly and in general it is going to be disoriented. But after several days of torment, upon opening the cage door the dog won't leave the cage. Voila a demonstration of the learned helplessness model in action. Now it just so happens that this type of psychological phenomenon applies to humans as well- if you read the psychological literature you will see this frequently mentioned. In short, it is one of those observations that the psychologists have made which makes the work of secret government police agencies such as the FBI and Secret Service all that much more efficient and frightening. For through the use of the psychological harassment known as "street theatre", the government's mind control program renders its victims helpless to resist in a rational and self-preserving manner. Not so humane you say? Remember that there are people in our society who, social outcasts that they are for purely political reasons having nothing to do with the merit of their past actions- in fact the typical mind control victim is a peaceful, intellectually capable, industrious and law- abiding person whose only known peccadillo is possibly to have offended powerful people- have less rights than those animals who can be assured through the work of animal rights activists not to be tormented longer than a week or so. For the politically incorrect inhabitants of America's electronic concentration camp, torture is a lifelong ordeal.

Before concluding with a mention of the physics of mind control (this will clear up hopefully a lot of confusion in the minds of some victims about what is possible and what most likely isn't), I should reiterate that I don't have solid proof that the stories of the mind control victims are true in the sense that their suffering is caused by a secret government program. So if I'm wrong and I do reserve the possibility for that although I consider it unlikely, my apologies to anyone who may potentially be adversely affected by what I have written. Thus, to recapitulate what we've found, we've seen how the chicanery of the psychiatrists cover for these alleged crimes by the government and socialist elites, and we've observed how psychology is used as a practical tool by the putative torturers to accomplish this bizarre agenda. Now the question ensues, is it real? I don't pretend to know the answer with absolute certainty, but I think it probably is real based on the quite rational and consistent accounts of the self-professed victims. But further, their claims can once and for all be proven or disproven at this time.

I.e., if microwave mind control is not just a figment of the imagination of the victims, it can be subject to investigation. There are claims (and ample documentation to substantiate this) that microwaves can be utilized to remotely alter and analyze the brain waves of individuals, and to insert voices and thoughts into the minds of the individuals. Furthermore it is alleged that images can be projected into the mind of an individual and that sudden movements can be engendered in the individual. This is all well documented so the interested reader can track down the documentation and judge for him- herself. Suffice it to say if such technology did exist, I would be astounded if the U.S. government hadn't been experimenting with it and perfecting its application for the last couple of decades since clearly it is rather powerful stuff. Two standard myths concerning such a possibility can easily be dismissed. The first is that a person can block the microwaves by wearing a tinfoil hat. Anyone with a cellular phone can readily demonstrate the falsity of this: I tried putting a cellular phone in the upper drawer of a heavy filing cabinet with drawers of sheet metal with no holes in the bottom of the drawers and which goes up half way on the sides of the drawers. I closed the upper drawer and left the lower drawer about 8 inches open. I tried calling the number and the phone rang. So the microwaves going to the phone had to reflect off circa five surfaces and are not too easily blocked. The other standard claim is that it would not be possible to cause one person in a room full of people to hear voices and not affect others in the room. This is a good point and it may be true, but from the claims of the mind control victims I suspect it is probably not. The reason is that the mechanism used to gain a window on the brain could utilize for instance something known as biological entrainement, whereby a given individual's brain is tricked into mimicking the incoming waveform- by virtue of the incoming waveform resembling the individual's unique brainwave patterns- and thereby the sensation of hearing is induced.

Therefore it is a matter of attempting either to block the microwaves or detect the microwaves. I maintain that blocking the microwaves would be very difficult for any extended period of time, just based on the physics of microwaves. However, if a person thought he/she were a victim of this, they should try exploring a cave for at least an hour. Hundreds of feet of limestone and/or sandstone will block the microwaves and there should be a definite near total attenuation of the signal. The reason the signal/sensation might not be totally attenuated is that the victim's brain after years of being tortured will have acquired possibly some degree of ability to generate the sounds/sensations which are caused by the microwave stimulation.

Having dealt with the microwaves, we next turn to the sound waves. To reiterate what was said before, most or all victims of microwave mind control claim there is a significant component of psychological harassment involved with mind control. This harassment is performed by neighbors, coworkers, and passers by. Again such claims could be substantiated or dismissed- if the victim goes out to a desert and still hears the voices the victim thinks are his/her neighbors where no one actually is, then something else may be going on. But if the victim, sitting in her house can look out the window upon hearing somebody call something out and see a lone person riding down the street riding on a bike, this is a strong indication of the veracity of such claims. Thus it remains to systematically record the verbal harassment. A victim would have to record all sound in his/her immediate vicinity constantly in order to demonstrate the case. This could be accomplished by dedicated software which would date and time stamp all vocal frequency events recorded. Recordings could be automatically analyzed for the identification of the harasser, and text of the harassment message could be produced. An enhancement to this system would be an interface to GPS to for instance locate which neighbor is responsible in order to initiate action for relief. All in all it's quite a lot of trouble a mind control victim would have to go through to forensically prove such claims, but it can be done. For if it can't be done in theory, then in my opinion, it can't be real.

However the situation seems serious enough that attempts should be made to scientifically verify or disprove such claims. Before ending, I mention in passing that this post deals only with microwave mind control and harassment, since I think this is the only credible type of mind control claim which may be true. Allegations of levitation, invisibility, "new physics" etc. are most likely based on genuine pseudoscience but not reality. In any case the technology and physics of microwaves and sound waves seem sufficient to produce the effects described by the credible accounts. So if any investigations are made they should first rule out the most likely causes.


"Microwaves and Mind Control"; McKinney, Julianne;

"Effects of GHz Radiation on the Human Nervous System: Recent developments in the technology of political control"; Girard, Harlan; 1991

Neurophilosophy: Towards a unified science of mind/brain; Churchland, Patricia; 1990

U.S. Patent 03951134, Malech, Robert; 1974 http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=US03951134__

"New World Vistas: Air and space power for the 21st Century"; USAF Scientific Advisory Board; 1996


We need help

On November 2003 Palo Alto CA. USA Ed. Kats wrote.

As I wrote to you before, my family was forcefully subjected to became Human Guinea Pigs in classified medical research conducted by the ...............

During routine operations while being under the general anesthesia, doctors involving in classified researses, implanted plantation of microchips into the heads of the member of the Kats family. One of the main courses of studies is exploring program-involving studies of human eyes. Most of the chipsets implanted into our sculls are perfectly visible on X-ray but surgical removal will involve loss of vision, vegetation of death. Some details of this draconian experiment could be review in our site: http://www.wass.8m.com

I would like to ask visitors of your site:

How possibly we can protect ourselves to eliminate interception of transmitted in our heads waves?

Perhaps somebody know what type of waves is being transmitted and on what type of frequencies our body is function on?

Is it existing anything that could dysfunction chip implanted into the human body without surgical involvements and anyhow effecting environments of the human body?

Please help us to provide information in regards of our questions.


Edward Kats.


Next to the Stanford Research

I was waiting for the next news but that issue was never appear in my e-folder. Consequently, I never got any mail from the visitors of your site. Aspect of your site involved in the discussing regarding of microwave and related to those topics. Ironically it is very close to what my family is experiencing on daily bases. Our residence has been bombarded by some kind of wave and an effect of it, - at least physically noticeable- our voices getting sounded very law. The face becomes tired. What we are reading in your e-magazine, those who are involved in the activity perhaps may suggest us what to do to stop this outrage terror. As I remember, many years ago US Government has accused Russians in deliberately transmitting microwaves signals at the US Embassy in Moscow. An effect of such an outrage act was similar what I'd just described to you above. I do know that many people would share with my family information that possibly could help us end electromagnetic horror we are going through. As I mention above, that issue where you suppose to place our request, was never arrived on my e-account. So. Please repeat if it's OK.

Ed. Kats


66th MIG assets to begin moving to Darmstadt

Bad Aibling replacement in Darmstadt-Griesheim?

Dear friends (and a few BCC recipients),

in local media, there was a few reports some days ago that in Griesheim - a little town some 5 km west of Darmstadt -, 4 satellite senders and 1 satellite receiver are going to be set up by the US Army. The permit they requested from the local authorities runs until 2012. The media calls it "radar" and "radomes". There is now some speculation as to whether part of the Bad Aibling capability is going to be moved to Darmstadt (with the rest going to Menwith Hill.) Another vague idea I have is that it could be an early preparation for a US missile defense system in Europe. But it seems there is also an intelligence unit located in Griesheim, so it could also be that the senders are used to send processed information to the NSA.

There is a German webpage with a few pictures, scans of newspaper articles, and a lot of links to English webpages on this issue. The URL is http://kai.iks-jena.de/miniwahr/badaibling.html

I will try to find someone locally who is technically knowledgable enough to look into this and hopefully work with people in the town parliament to try to gain access to further information. As the US Army does this under NATO Statute, there is no information available publicly, and they need not undergo normal planning and environmental protection procedures (hi, CAAB, does this sound familiar?) But I thought I should make the community aware of this development. And maybe someone can add information.

In peace


See also:

NIH Physician's Statement About Mind Control

A letter from Eldon Byrd

Dr. Eldon Byrd
2002 Letter of Corroboration of NIH Md.
Statement About Mind Control

C.A.H.R.A. Home Page

April 27, 2002

To Whom It May Concern

The attached Statement On Mind Control, dated April 11th, 2002 was sent directly to me by the author. Given the controversy surrounding mind control, Cheryl Welsh of CAHRA has asked me to substantiate the medical doctor's Statement. The physician does not want to sign his Statement, because he does not want to become involved with victims for whom he has no help to offer.

I am aware of the physicians research work when he was associated with the National Institutes of Health, and I consider it to be of the highest standard. I am also familiar with his Patents and his work in the identification of virus' in small samples of fluids. In my opinion, the statements he has made in his Statement can be taken as true, reflecting facts and events which occurred.

The author is also personally known to me and has related some of the information contained in the document to me on prior occasions. There was no information given to the author prior to his producing the initial document other than to ask if he would write up some of his experiences with mind control. The last two paragraphs were added by the author after he became aware of the experiment I did for CAHRA. He was asked to comment on the experiment without additional input from anyone. I can corroborate the following points contained in the Statement:

I knew Senator Claiborne Pell, his Legislative Assistant referred to in the document, and the investigative reporter also mentioned. I was aware that they were involved in mind control investigations and that they had data that indicated the existence of technology that could be used to effect some sort of mind control. Specifically, I was aware of the photograph of a signal that appeared on an individual's TV screen. I had several meetings with that individual and examined the photograph mentioned in the Statement.

Also, I asked the Legislative Assistant to comment on the physician's Statement. He stated to me: "...what he has written details the events as I recall them, and as we discussed at the time they were going on." He does not want to be identified for the same reason the MD does not want to be identified.

NIH Physician's Statement About Mind Control

[Original signed]

Eldon Byrd C.A.H.R.A. Home Page

April 11, 2002

Question of antennas in nanotechnology

I'm sure you already are aware, that the mobile phone is being used to draw this technology to a victim.

I believe this is so widespread now it may be beyond control.

We now know mobiles can pick up a signal even when switched off, and think of the times you have gone to a place where no-one knows you, and certain aspects of the harassment you are experiencing begins from people (locals) that were already there before you arrived. Even at places you may have stopped at, such as cafes, without prior knowledge yourself. So nothing could possibly have been set up.

I think in the course of time this may not sound so strange.

This technology has opened the door to control by anyone with sufficient power, anywhere in the world.


I am being tortured with electronic technology, which I believe is from neighbours. At nights I awaken to feel my legs and feet tingling, and this becomes very painful, causing extreme pain. I can feel the pulsed energy hitting against me. After a bad bout of this my face feels like it is sunburned.

Excerpt from two messages from Maureen


Very important message from the Kats family, Palo Alto, California

To whom it may concern.

My name is Ed. Kats. My family and I are victims of Classified Medical Research illegally run http://www.wass.8m.com .

We feel obligated to inform people about ongoing classified medical experiments executed by agencies and prevent in the future identical experiments. http://www.wass.8m.com

We would be appreciate to assist us deliver this message to as many people as possible. http://www.wass.8m.com

We are blocked from any contact that family is trying to establish in order to achieve assistance from the Citizens. If we are not responding, it means connection is blocked.


Please HELP.

Sincerely Kats family.
Mind Control Test Subjects.

Why are many suffering today? - Mind Control and Electronic Surveillance?



HAARP schon 1999 im EU-Parlament behandelt

DOC_DE\RR\370\370003 PE 227.710/end

14. Januar 1999 A4-0005/99


Über Umwelt, Sicherheit und Außenpolitik Ausschuß für auswärtige Angelegenheiten, Sicherheit und Verteidigungspolitik Berichterstatterin: Frau Maj Britt Theorin Verfasser der Stellungnahme*: Herr Olsson, Ausschuß für Umweltfragen, Volksgesundheit und Verbraucherschutz
(* "Hughes"-Verfahren)


In der Erwägung, daß die allgemeine Besorgnis über die Verschlechterung des Zustands der Umwelt und die Umweltkrisen es erforderlich macht, Prioritäten in den nationalen Entscheidungsprozessen zu setzen und daß die Länder gemeinsam wirksam auf Umweltkatastrophen reagieren,

- unter Hinweis auf die Konferenzen der Vereinten Nationen in Kyoto im Jahr 1997 und in Rio de Janeiro im Jahr 1992, - unter Hinweis auf die Anhörung über HAARP und nichttödliche Waffen, die der Unterausschuß für Sicherheit und Abrüstung des Ausschusses für auswärtige Angelegenheiten am 5. Februar 1998 in Brüssel durchgeführt hat,

8. fordert das Militär auf, alle Aktivitäten einzustellen, die zu Umwelt- und Gesundheitsschäden beitragen, und alle notwendigen Schritte zur Sanierung und Dekontaminierung der verseuchten Gebiete zu unternehmen;

21. ist der Ansicht, daß der Geheimhaltung in der militärischen Forschung entgegengewirkt und das Recht auf Offenheit und demokratische Prüfung militärischer Forschungsprojekte gestärkt werden muß;

Rechtliche Aspekte militärischer Tätigkeiten

26. fordert die Europäische Union auf, sich dafür einzusetzen, daß auch die neuen sogenannten nichttödlichen Waffensysteme und die Entwicklung neuer Waffenstrategien durch internationale Übereinkommen erfaßt und geregelt werden;

27. hält HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) wegen der weitreichenden Umweltauswirkungen für eine globale Angelegenheit und fordert, die rechtlichen, ökologischen und ethischen Auswirkungen von einem unabhängigen internationalen Organ untersuchen zu lassen, bevor weitere Forschungsarbeiten und Versuche stattfinden; bedauert die wiederholte Weigerung der Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten, einen Vertreter zu der öffentlichen Anhörung oder den folgenden Sitzungen seines zuständigen Ausschusses über die Auswirkungen des Forschungsprogramms über hochfrequente Strahlen (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project - HAARP), das gegenwärtig in Alaska durchgeführt wird, zu entsenden;

28. fordert die STOA-Lenkungsgruppe (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment) auf, ihre Zustimmung zu geben, daß die wissenschaftlichen und technischen Beweise, die in allen vorliegenden Forschungsergebnissen über HAARP vorliegen, untersucht werden, um die genaue Art und das Gefährdungspotential, das HAARP sowohl für die lokale als auch für die globale Umwelt sowie für die Gesundheit der Menschen generell darstellt, zu ermitteln;

29. fordert die Kommission auf, in Zusammenarbeit mit den Regierungen von Schweden, Finnland, Norwegen und der Russischen Föderation die Auswirkungen des HAARP-Programms auf die arktischen Gebiete Europas unter den Aspekten Umwelt und Gesundheit der Bevölkerung zu untersuchen und dem Parlament über die Ergebnisse zu berichten;

30. fordert vor allem ein internationales Übereinkommen über ein generelles Verbot von Forschungs- und Entwicklungsprojekten - ob militärisch oder zivil -, die die Anwendung der Erkenntnisse auf dem Gebiet chemischer und elektrischer Vorgänge oder von Schallwellen oder anderen Funktionen des menschlichen Gehirns zur Entwicklung von Waffen beinhalten, die jeder beliebigen Form der Manipulation des Menschen Tür und Tor öffnen könnten; dieses Übereinkommen sollte auch ein Verbot aller derzeit bekannten sowie aller erdenklichen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten solcher Systeme umfassen;

31. fordert die Europäische Union und ihre Mitgliedstaaten auf, sich für internationale Vereinbarungen einzusetzen, um die Umwelt im Kriegsfall vor unnötigen Zerstörungen zu bewahren;

32. fordert die Europäische Union und ihre Mitgliedsländer auf, sich dafür einzusetzen, daß internationale Regeln auch für militärische Tätigkeiten in Friedenszeiten mit Blick auf ihre Umweltauswirkungen festgelegt werden;

Dokument zum Download (pdf, ca 116 KB)
auf der Seite des EU-Parl.: http://www2.europarl.eu.int/

siehe auch:




Victim of psi/electronic harassment

I am a victim of psi/electronic harassment. My name is Damian Hall.

On over 300 victims of neuro electro events known without camera or bugging - no mental illness can produce this - only a neuro electro Psi predatory fix.

Perps preying on me can be identified in near future though I have not verified them as yet. Ringleader was same person acting as agent provocateur on end of Tregonwell Rd, Bournemouth in May 98. It is the same person going whisper to skull Psi and remote viewing, dream manipulating and in magnetic sleep nervous system manipulation remote configurated.

Don't know what to say. Police/judges etc are in dark about this form of preying as are general public - it may be known of but not acknowledged.

Don't know what to suggest except appeal with McKinney/Dr Richard Alan Miller/ Carole Smith article in Psycho social journal Volume 13 about need for critical analysis of psychosis in light of mind invasive technology. I have copy of this article if you haven't.

I, personally believe mind invasive devices may well be being used in tandem with group SRA Cultic Psi predatory telepathy or without. I think it important not to only dwell on devices and techniques of SRA and predatory cultic practises to get Psi telepathy fixes needs unearthing. I will ascertain perps preying on me soon and hope to expose. Not many reported targets in England. I am one of them for five years. Four reported targets in England coincidentally come from Yorkshire or live there. Miriam Findlay and George Faraquar, Scottish I believe. That may well be coincidence to USA Intelligence base near Whitby North Yorks or devices filched off them being used possibly as an outside chance.


Victims from San Diego




On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology


'Cell towers' seen to be the actual cause of all the new problems that are attributed to cellphone use?


I'm patiently waiting for the day when these new transmitters, which are erroneously called 'cell towers' are seen to be the actual cause of all the new problems that are attributed to cellphone use. Compared to the effects of cellphones, these new towers are off the chart in terms of damage to the nerve tissue and brain functions of everyone who lives within range of them (usually about three miles).

Since there's no hard data on the internet or elsewhere about how these towers work, I send around the attached article, which I feel tells of their true purpose and effects.



New Body Screeners in use in London: We are living in a dystopian nightmare



Government Use Of Microwave Weaponry Is Zapping People To Death

Danke für diesen interessanten Text. Ich verstehe ihn auch als einen weiteren Hinweis in Richtung meiner Vermutung eines direkten Zusammenhangs zwischen Chemtrailerei und Mindcontrol-Terror.

Ruth Gill

----- Original Message -----
From: Gabriel Stetter
To: Ruth Gill
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 10:17 PM

Government Use Of Microwave Weaponry Is Zapping People To Death

By Greg Szymanski



The stories about innocent Americans being harassed, spied on and even zapped with microwave weaponry continues to mount, as the list is beginning to look as long as the New York City phone book.

Now comes forward Nancy Taormina of Spokane, Washington, who claims to have been targeted by the military after complaining years ago about low flying jets and chem-trails, an every day occurrence near her home.

"They never let me sleep at night, as they are using a combination of high frequencies and other electronic weaponry to not only keep me awake but that actually cause physical pain," said Taormina, 53, who now sleeps in a hidden portion of her basement away from any windows.

"Years ago I kept complaining to the military base nearby about their airplanes and weaponry programs and after that they began targeting me with electronic weaponry."

Prior to the harassment, Taormina led a normal life but ever since the military began its insidious use of electronic weapons, drastic changes to her sleeping patterns have left her sleeping days and pacing the floor at nights.

As another defense mechanism, she limits all use of electronics, including computers, radios, televisions and any other means the government may use to invade her privacy through electronic means.

"I have been singled out and targeted. Once they start, they never stop," said Taormina, adding that her house has been turned into a prison by the military ever since the harassment began. "I can't remember the last night I slept well. Sometimes they use a very high pitch ringing that keeps you awake and then there are other frequencies which actually penetrate the body, causing pain.

"It doesn't matter where I go, they usually find me. So I am thinking perhaps I need to leave the country to somewhere like Indonesia ."

However, while here in the states, Taormina has become a voracious reader on the subject of electronic weaponry and government mind control programs, compiling a virtual library in her house on the subject.

"People just don't realize how whole neighborhoods are being targeted and the vast number of people who are being subjected to this type of mind and body manipulation," said Taormina. "When it first happened to me, I couldn't believe it either, but after talking to a number of people I am convinced this is going on all over the country."

Besides Taormina, at least 40 people across the country have contacted the Arctic Beacon with similar accounts, documenting the same type intrusive occurrences, including sleep disruption and other more serious attacks.

For example, John Mecca of New York has come forward, saying he was actually operated on in his sleep and an implant chip placed behind his ears.

To fight back, Mecca has started a web site where he educates the public on the government programs that authorize use of such microwave weaponry, the types of sophisticated weaponry used and methods and ways for people targeted to fight back.

"Many of you have deep instinctual subconscious gnawing in your gut that something is just not right. Like Deja Vu you have a suspicion things are going on around you, but they are not in focus and you forget all about the numerous strange things that keep happening," said Mecca, an inventor, author and investigator into mind control and microwave attacks who was targeted after trying to market a revolutionary product, upsetting the established, old money financial applecart.

"Some of you have been putting the pieces of the puzzle together a little at a time getting just a glimpse of the true reality all around you. It's your loyalty to the system that generates the denial and therefore blindness of the truth that the system could be so bad, this has you frozen from believing that's it really true. You're surrounded by the administrative workings of a world gone mad. Welcome to your worst nightmare: microwave weaponry."

His web site can be found at
http://www.us-government-torture.com and is one of the more comprehensive places to search out the destructive use of this modern technology in order to basically numb the American public into submission

One of the more astonishing accounts of the use of microwave weaponry recently came from a person and place least expected, Dan Nelson, 45, a simple carpenter from the small town of Livingston, Montana, who said he was zapped severely in the head and abdomen by a portable microwave unit outside his home after going public about some sensitive 9/11 information.

"Ever since I tried to let people know about what I found out about
9/11, I have had many things happen. Within 12 hours of leaving a message on the phone of a popular radio host, I had a light green helicopter follow me where ever I went," said Livingston about two months ago on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal. "The next day, after it first appeared, it showed up again at my friend's house and he will verify the incident. Two days after the helicopter incident, two men in a car tried very hard to run me and my daughter off the road while we were on my motorcycle.

"And the harassment just never seemed to stop after I saw that first helicopter. For example, I had a man come up to me when I was trying to get into my house and, for no good reason, poke me in the stomach with something which made me very sick, later causing a staff infection. He ran away before I could catch him and as a result I had to take heavy duty drugs. But the most painful was when I felt my insides bubbling, and I was getting very hot as I was washing dishes. The next thing I know I can hear the fluid in my head bubbling and got a massive head ache."

Since the radio show appearance two months ago, Livingston this week said the harassment never stopped, adding he has been followed and even confronted by what he thinks were government agents in his local, small town grocery store.

"I still have not been left alone although things are not as bad as this summer. After being on the radio show, I was followed all over town by a lady in a Suburban," said Nelson from his home in Livingston

"We have been being sprayed by jets everyday for at least three weeks and everybody is getting very sick and all of us are getting migraines and nose bleeds which we never had before. Many more antennas are going up none stop and lots of military equipment is being transported on West I-90. This has been going on for six months and is all being transported by private companies not the military."

For more informative articles, go to http://www.arcticbeacon.com



I have been victim of Mind control in France, for more than seven years with wired sound projections

Thank you for your actions

Hello, I write to you in French, because I do not know German and I am sorry. I am called Catherine. I have been victim of Mind control in France, for more than seven years with wired sound projections.

Just like you, the result of my complaints deposited everywhere
(extraction of my voice subvocale, readings obligatory of programmed recordings, extortions of remote consents, groups making the experimentation by seeing all everywhere, also making an experiment on the brain, the memory, the word, the body (micro waves) made me convene in Psychiatry by the Police force.

At this time there, I did not know that there were victims of this experiments. I was received with a witness woman where I explained after a fashion what occurred and that all went with radiations, waves, frequencies, etc. When the question was asked to me: Can we have to handle you? I had to answer "no" of office bus if I had answered "yes" they could intern me in the direction of the Law where I could become dangerous towards the others or myself...

They nevertheless recognized that the means could be soldiers but how what I told them exceeded by far technologies of what one could do! I had brought my microphone to show them that nevertheless I could record a part of the strongest sound projections (rays on the electrical equipment boxes of the residence, rays audios, etc). They asked me to indicate my suspects and to return once that I could have observed some more. The experiments now use micro waves which affect the skin directly and create neurological pains, body impressions of heat or cold at will, fields cerebral modified, etc.

My studio is surrounded from people who make this experiment (more than 20). From one or two it is known that they are interested in the thought, he is more than thirty years and had named to me several names of people in my immediate environment. He works for the Ministry for National Education and Research. The partitions of the building let pass the noises, I had heard him many once capacity to tell my basic day in roof with his friend and to have the proof that he knew whole very: telephone conversations, actions, etc. I thus have make a personal investigation in a close bookshop where it was confirmed to me that the one of them is engaged in the field of the thought. The person who told this with the newsagent had been able to accept this too constraining station... I saw arriving tubular radiations in my apartment or in skew which can reach other buildings and other apartments. At the interior even in my studio many radiations were sent, of fixed audio rays one placed... On the Door of Versailles many ministries are important of Defense.

I live the weekend in a place where at summer placed everywhere many antennas relay. I am in contact with other French victims of these odious experiments. I would like to be able to meet you and speak (to testify) from what occurs in all impunity in spite of beginnings from Laws to France in districts known as middle-class.



Physical Control of the Mind


Government Mind Control


The Extradition, Torture and Electronic Mind Control of U.S. Citizen

John Gregory Lambros, a Native of Minnesota


Petition: Folter ausdrücklich zu ächten und insbesondere als Mittel zur Informationsbeschaffung als mit den im Grundgesetz als unvereinbar zu erklären


DEVELOPMENT OF NEW METHOD of vaccinations and treatment of infectious diseases with use of the device on the basis of structure with controlled energy material (CEM)


Microwave Mind Control Symptoms & Published Evidence


Mind Control in the U.K.




What's on your Mind?


U.S. patent 6,506,148: Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors

United States Patent: Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors

has a "Query" bar in which "6,506,148" may be typed. That leads to a description of a new technology patent, which allows manipulation of the human central nervous system via broadcast television signals, DVD, and computer terminal. Scrolling to "Summary" gives some details.

Informant: Donna




Computer chips get under skin of enthusiasts


The lie detector you'll never know is there


Brain Voice Read-Write Machine


Informant: mark lee

New Device Will Sense Through Concrete Walls

American Forces Press Service
Sat Jan 7, 2006 14:26

American Forces Press Service | Donna Miles | January 03, 2006

WASHINGTON - Troops conducting urban operations soon will have the capabilities of superheroes, being able to sense through 12 inches of concrete to determine if someone is inside a building.

The new "Radar Scope" will give warfighters searching a building the ability to tell within seconds if someone is in the next room, Edward Baranoski from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's Special Projects Office, told the American Forces Press Service.

By simply holding the portable, handheld device up to a wall, users will be able to detect movements as small as breathing, he said.

The Radar Scope, developed by DARPA, is expected to be fielded to troops in Iraq as soon as this spring, Baranoski said. The device is likely to be fielded to the squad level, for use by troops going door to door in search of terrorists.

The Radar Scope will give warfighters the capability to sense through a foot of concrete and 50 feet beyond that into a room, Baranoski explained.

It will bring to the fight what larger, commercially available motion detectors couldn't, he said. Weighing just a pound and a half, the Radar Scope will be about the size of a telephone handset and cost just about $1,000, making it light enough for a soldier to carry and inexpensive enough to be fielded widely.

The Radar Scope will be waterproof and rugged, and will run on AA batteries, he said.

"It may not change how four-man stacks go into a room (during clearing operations)," Baranoski said. "But as they go into a building, it can help them prioritize what rooms they go into. It will give them an extra degree of knowledge so they know if someone is inside."

Even as the organization hurries to get the devices to combat forces, DARPA already is laying groundwork for bigger plans that build on this technology.

Proposals are expected this week for the new "Visi Building" technology that's more than a motion detector. It will actually "see" through multiple walls, penetrating entire buildings to show floor plans, locations of occupants and placement of materials such as weapons caches, Baranoski said.

"It will give (troops) a lot of opportunity to stake out buildings and really see inside," he said. "It will go a long way in extending their surveillance capabilities."

The device is expected to take several years to develop. Ultimately, servicemembers will be able to use it simply by driving or flying by the structure under surveillance, Baranoski said.








Informant: John Mecca



Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves

United States Patent Malech
Patent Number: 03951134


Apparatus for and method of sensing brain waves at a position remote from a subject whereby electromagnetic signals of different frequencies are simultaneously transmitted to the brain of the subject in which the signals interfere with one another to yield a waveform which is modulated by the subject's brain waves. The interference waveform which is representative of the brain wave activity is re-transmitted by the brain to a receiver where it is demodulated and amplified. The demodulated waveform is then displayed for visual viewing and routed to a computer for further processing and analysis. The demodulated waveform also can be used to produce a compensating signal which is transmitted back to the brain to effect a desired change in electrical activity therein.

Inventors: Malech; Robert G. (Plainview, NY)

Assignee: Dorne & Margolin Inc. (Bohemia, NY)

Appl. No.: 494518

Filed: August 5, 1974


What is claimed is:

1. Brain wave monitoring apparatus comprising means for producing a base frequency signal, means for producing a first signal having a frequency related to that of the base frequency and at a predetermined phase related thereto, means for transmitting both said base frequency and said first signals to the brain of the subject being monitored, means for receiving a second signal transmitted by the brain of the subject being monitored in response to both said base frequency and said first signals, mixing means for producing from said base frequency signal and said received second signal a response signal having a frequency related to that of the base frequency, and means for interpreting said response signal.

2. Apparatus as in claim 1 where said receiving means comprises means for isolating the transmitted signals from the received second signals.

3. Apparatus as in claim 2 further comprising a band pass filter with an input connected to said isolating means and an output connected to said mixing means.

4. Apparatus as in claim 1 further comprising means for amplifying said response signal.

5. Apparatus as in claim 4 further comprising means for demodulating said amplified response signal.

6. Apparatus as in claim 5 further comprising interpreting means connected to the output of said demodulator means.

7. Apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising means for producing an electromagnetic wave control signal dependent on said response signal, and means for transmitting said control signal to the brain of said subject.

8. Apparatus as in claim 7 wherein said transmitting means comprises means for directing the electromagnetic wave control signal to a predetermined part of the brain.

9. A process for monitoring brain wave activity of a subject comprising the steps of transmitting at least two electromagnetic energy signals of different frequencies to the brain of the subject being monitored, receiving an electromagnetic energy signal resulting from the mixing of said two signals in the brain modulated by the brain wave activity and retransmitted by the brain in response to said transmitted energy signals, and, interpreting said received signal.

10. A process as in claim 9 further comprising the step of transmitting a further electromagnetic wave signal to the brain to vary the brain wave activity.

11. A process as in claim 10 wherein the step of transmitting the further signals comprises obtaining a standard signal, comparing said received electromagnetic energy signals with said standard signal, producing a compensating signal corresponding to the comparison between said received electrogagnetic energy signals and the standard signal, and transmitting the compensating signals to the brain of the subject being monitored.



Medical science has found brain waves to be a useful barometer of organic functions. Measurements of electrical activity in the brain have been instrumental in detecting physical and psychic disorder, measuring stress, determining sleep patterns, and monitoring body metabolism.

The present art for measurement of brain waves employs electroencephalographs including probes with sensors which are attached to the skull of the subject under study at points proximate to the regions of the brain being monitored. Electrical contact between the sensors and apparatus employed to process the detected brain waves is maintained by a plurality of wires extending from the sensors to the apparatus. The necessity for physically attaching the measuring apparatus to the subject imposes several limitations on the measurement process. The subject may experience discomfort, particulary if the measurements are to be made over extended periods of time. His bodily movements are restricted and he is generally confined to the immediate vicinity of the measuring apparatus. Furthermore, measurements cannot be made while the subject is conscious without his awareness. The comprehensiveness of the measurements is also limited since the finite number of probes employed to monitor local regions of brain wave activity do not permit observation of the total brain wave profile in a single test.


The present invention relates to apparatus and a method for monitoring brain waves wherein all components of the apparatus employed are remote from the test subject. More specifically, high frequency transmitters are operated to radiate electromagnetic energy of different frequencies through antennas which are capable of scanning the entire brain of the test subject or any desired region thereof. The signals of different frequencies penetrate the skull of the subject and impinge upon the brain where they mix to yield an interference wave modulated by radiations from the brain's natural electrical activity. The modulated interference wave is re-transmitted by the brain and received by an antenna at a remote station where it is demodulated, and processed to provide a profile of the suject's brain waves. In addition to passively monitoring his brain waves, the subject's neurological processes may be affected by transmitting to his brain, through a transmitter, compensating signals. The latter signals can be derived from the received and processed brain waves.


It is therefore an object of the invention to remotely monitor electrical activity in the entire brain or selected local regions thereof with a single measurement.

Another object is the monitoring of a subject's brain wave activity through transmission and reception of electromagnetic waves.

Still another object is to monitor brain wave activity from a position remote from the subject.

A further object is to provide a method and apparatus for affecting brain wave activity by transmitting electromagnetic signals thereto.


Other and further objects of the invention will appear from the following description and the accompanying drawings, which form part of the instant specification and which are to be read in conjunction therewith, and in which like reference numerals are used to indicate like parts in the various views;

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the interconnection of the components of the apparatus of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing signal flow in one embodiment of the apparatus.


Referring to the drawings, specifically FIG. 1, a high frequency transmitter 2 produces and supplies two electromagnetic wave signals through suitable coupling means 14 to an antenna 4. The signals are directed by the antenna 4 to the skull 6 of the subject 8 being examined. The two signals from the antenna 4, which travel independently, penetrate the skull 6 and impinge upon the tissue of the brain 10.

Within the tissue of the brain 10, the signals combine, much in the manner of a conventional mixing process technique, with each section of the brain having a different modulating action. The resulting waveform of the two signals has its greatest amplitude when the two signals are in phase and thus reinforcing one another. When the signals are exactly 180.degree. out of phase the combination produces a resultant waveform of minimum amplitude. If the amplitudes of the two signals transmitted to the subject are maintained at identical levels, the resultant interference waveform, absent influences of external radiation, may be expected to assume zero intensity when maximum interference occurs, the number of such points being equal to the difference in frequencies of the incident signals. However, interference by radiation from electrical activity within the brain 10 causes the waveform resulting from interference of the two transmitted signals to vary from the expected result, i.e., the interference waveform is modulated by the brain waves. It is believed that this is due to the fact that brain waves produce electric charges each of which has a component of electromagnetic radiation associated with it. The electromagnetic radiation produced by the brain waves in turn reacts with the signals transmitted to the brain from the external source.

The modulated interference waveform is re-transmitted from the brain 10, back through the skull 6. A quantity of energy is re-transmitted sufficient to enable it to be picked up by the antenna 4. This can be controlled, within limits, by adjusting the absolute and relative intensities of the signals, originally transmitted to the brain. Of course, the level of the transmitted energy should be kept below that which may be harmful to the subject.

The antenna passes the received signal to a receiver 12 through the antenna electronics 14. Within the receiver the wave is amplified by conventional RF amplifiers 16 and demodulated by conventional detector and modulator electronics 18. The demodulated wave, representing the intra-brain electrical activity, is amplified by amplifiers 20 and the resulting information in electronic form is stored in buffer circuitry 22. From the buffers 22 the information is fed to a suitable visual display 24, for example one employing a cathode ray tube, light emitting diodes, liquid crystals, or a mechanical plotter. The information may also be channeled to a computer 26 for further processing and analysis with the output of the computer displayed by heretofore mentioned suitable means.

In addition to channeling its information to display devices 24, the computer 26 can also produce signals to control an auxiliary transmitter 28. Transmitter 28 is used to produce a compensating signal which is transmitted to the brain 10 of the subject 8 by the antenna 4. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the compensating signal is derived as a function of the received brain wave signals, although it can be produced separately. The compensating signals affect electrical activity within the brain 10.

Various configurations of suitable apparatus and electronic circuitry may be utilized to form the system generally shown in FIG. 1 and one of the many possible configurations is illustrated in FIG. 2. In the example shown therein, two signals, one of 100 MHz and the other of 210 MHz are transmitted simultaneously and combine in the brain 10 to form a resultant wave of frequency equal to the difference in frequencies of the incident signals, i.e., 110 MHz. The sum of the two incident frequencies is also available, but is discarded in subsequent filtering. The 100 MHz signal is obtained at the output 37 of an RF power divider 34 into which a 100 MHz signal generated by an oscillator 30 is injected. The oscillator 30 is of a conventional type employing either crystals for fixed frequency circuits or a tunable circuit set to oscillate at 100 MHz. It can be a pulse generator, square wave generator or sinusoidal wave generator. The RF power divider can be any conventional VHF, UHF or SHF frequency range device constructed to provide, at each of three outputs, a signal identical in frequency to that applied to its input.

The 210 MHz signal is derived from the same 100 MHz oscillator 30 and RF power divider 34 as the 100 MHz signal, operating in concert with a frequency doubler 36 and 10 MHz oscillator 32. The frequency doubler can be any conventional device which provides at its output a signal with frequency equal to twice the frequency of a signal applied at its input. The 10 MHz oscillator can also be of conventional type similar to the 100 MHz oscillator herebefore described. A 100 MHz signal from the output 39 of the RF power divider 34 is fed through the frequency doubler 36 and the resulting 200 MHz signal is applied to a mixer 40. The mixer 40 can be any conventional VHF, UHF or SHF frequency range device capable of accepting two input signals of differing frequencies and providing two output signals with frequencies equal to the sum and difference in frequencies respectively of the input signals. A 10 MHz signal from the oscillator 32 is also applied to the mixer 40. The 200 MHz signal from the doubler 36 and the 10 MHz signal from the oscillator 32 combine in the mixer 40 to form a signal with a frequency of 210 MHz equal to the sum of the frequencies of the 200 MHz and 10 MHz signals.

The 210 MHz signal is one of the signals transmitted to the brain 10 of the subject being monitored. In the arrangement shown in FIG. 2, an antenna 41 is used to transmit the 210 MHz signal and another antenna 43 is used to transmit the 100 MHz signal. Of course, a single antenna capable of operating at 100 MHz and 210 MHz frequencies may be used to transmit both signals. The scan angle, direction and rate may be controlled mechanically, e.g., by a reversing motor, or electronically, e.g., by energizing elements in the antenna in proper synchronization. Thus, the antenna(s) can be of either fixed or rotary conventional types.

A second 100 MHz signal derived from output terminal 37 of the three-way power divider 34 is applied to a circulator 38 and emerges therefrom with a desired phase shift. The circulator 38 can be of any conventional type wherein a signal applied to an input port emerges from an output port with an appropriate phase shift. The 100 MHz signal is then transmitted to the brain 10 of the subject being monitored via the antenna 43 as the second component of the dual signal transmission. The antenna 43 can be of conventional type similar to antenna 41 herebefore described. As previously noted, these two antennas may be combined in a single unit.

The transmitted 100 and 210 MHz signal components mix within the tissue in the brain 10 and interfere with one another yielding a signal of a frequency of 110 MHz, the difference in frequencies of the two incident components, modulated by electromagnetic emissions from the brain, i.e., the brain wave activity being monitored. This modulated 110 MHz signal is radiated into space.

The 110 MHz signal, modulated by brain wave activity, is picked up by an antenna 45 and channeled back through the circulator 38 where it undergoes an appropriate phase shift. The circulator 38 isolates the transmitted signals from the received signal. Any suitable diplexer or duplexer can be used. The antenna 45 can be of conventional type similar to antennas 41 and 43. It can be combined with them in a single unit or it can be separate. The received modulated 110 MHz signal is then applied to a band pass filter 42, to eliminate undesirable harmonics and extraneous noise, and the filtered 110 MHz signal is inserted into a mixer 44 into which has also been introduced a component of the 100 MHz signal from the source 30 distributed by the RF power divider 34. The filter 42 can be any conventional band pass filter. The mixer 44 may also be of conventional type similar to the mixer 40 herebefore described.

The 100 MHz and 110 MHz signals combine in the mixer 44 to yield a signal of frequency equal to the difference in frequencies of the two component signals, i.e., 10 MHz still modulated by the monitored brain wave activity. The 10 MHz signal is amplified in an IF amplifier 46 and channeled to a demodulator 48. The IF amplifier and demodulator 48 can both be of conventional types. The type of demodulator selected will depend on the characteristics of the signals transmitted to and received from the brain, and the information desired to be obtained. The brain may modulate the amplitude, frequency and/or phase of the interference waveform. Certain of these parameters will be more sensitive to corresponding brain wave characteristics than others. Selection of amplitude, frequency or phase demodulation means is governed by the choice of brain wave characteristic to be monitored. If desired, several different types of demodulators can be provided and used alternately or at the same time.

The demodulated signal which is representative of the monitored brain wave activity is passed through audio amplifiers 50 a, b, c which may be of conventional type where it is amplified and routed to displays 58 a, b, c and a computer 60. The displays 58 a, b, c present the raw brain wave signals from the amplifiers 50 a, b, c. The computer 60 processes the amplified brain wave signals to derive information suitable for viewing, e.g., by suppressing, compressing, or expanding elements thereof, or combining them with other information-bearing signals and presents that information on a display 62. The displays can be conventional ones such as the types herebefore mentioned employing electronic visual displays or mechanical plotters 58b. The computer can also be of conventional type, either analog or digital, or a hybrid.

A profile of the entire brain wave emission pattern may be monitored or select areas of the brain may be observed in a single measurement simply by altering the scan angle and direction of the antennas. There is no physical contact between the subject and the monitoring apparatus. The computer 60 also can determine a compensating waveform for transmission to the brain 10 to alter the natural brain waves in a desired fashion. The closed loop compensating system permits instantaneous and continuous modification of the brain wave response pattern.

In performing the brain wave pattern modification function, the computer 60 can be furnished with an external standard signal from a source 70 representative of brain wave activity associated with a desired nuerological response. The region of the brain responsible for the response is monitored and the received signal, indicative of the brain wave activity therein, is compared with the standard signal. The computer 60 is programmed to determine a compensating signal, responsive to the difference between the standard signal and received signal. The compensating signal, when transmitted to the monitored region of the brain, modulates the natural brain wave activity therein toward a reproduction of the standard signal, thereby changing the neurological response of the subject.

The computer 60 controls an auxiliary transmitter 64 which transmits the compensating signal to the brain 10 of the subject via an antenna 66. The transmitter 64 is of the high frequency type commonly used in radar applications. The antenna 66 can be similar to antennas 41, 43 and 45 and can be combined with them. Through these means, brain wave activity may be altered and deviations from a desired norm may be compensated. Brain waves may be monitored and control signals transmitted to the brain from a remote station.

It is to be noted that the configuration described is one of many possibilities which may be formulated without departing from the spirit of my invention. The transmitters can be monostratic or bistatic. They also can be single, dual, or multiple frequency devices. The transmitted signal can be continuous wave, pulse, FM, or any combination of these as well as other transmission forms. Typical operating frequencies for the transmitters range from 1 MHz to 40 GHz but may be altered to suit the particular function being monitored and the characteristics of the specific subject.

The individual components of the system for monitoring and controlling brain wave activity may be of conventional type commonly employed in radar systems.

Various subassemblies of the brain wave monitoring and control apparatus may be added, substituted or combined. Thus, separate antennas or a single multi-mode antenna may be used for transmission and reception. Additional displays and computers may be added to present and analyze select components of the monitored brain waves.

Modulation of the interference signal retransmitted by the brain may be of amplitude, frequency and/or phase. Appropriate demodulators may be used to decipher the subject's brain activity and select components of his brain waves may be analyzed by computer to determine his mental state and monitor his thought processes.

As will be appreciated by those familiar with the art, apparatus and method of the subject invention has numerous uses. Persons in critical positions such as drivers and pilots can be continuously monitored with provision for activation of an emergency device in the event of human failure. Seizures, sleepiness and dreaming can be detected. Bodily functions such as pulse rate, heartbeat reqularity and others also can be monitored and occurrences of hallucinations can be detected. The system also permits medical diagnoses of patients, inaccessible to physicians, from remote stations.





Capt Paul E Tyler MC USN


Your brain may soon be used against you

By Faye Flam
Inquirer Staff Writer

Posted on Tue, Oct. 29, 2002

RON CORTES / Inquirer

Ruben Gur, a Penn scientist, says brain scanners could be used in criminal interrogations. He says privacy concerns should not overshadow potential benefits in understanding better how the mind works.

The last refuge of secrets and lies - the brain - may be about to reveal all.

Scientists are finding ways to use the brain's activity to expose truths a person may try to hide. The techniques could revolutionize police work, improve national security, and threaten personal privacy.

"It's the scariest thing around," said physicist Robert Park, an outspoken critic of old-fashioned, unreliable polygraph machines. "The only thing worse than a lie detector that doesn't work is one that does."

Ruben Gur, a neuropsychologist at the University of Pennsylvania, says new kinds of brain scans can reveal when a person recognizes a familiar face, no matter how hard he or she tries to conceal it.

The scanning machine, called a functional MRI, takes pictures that highlight specific parts of the brain activated during certain tasks. Telltale parts of your brain "light up," he said, when you are presented with a face you have seen before.

It is easy to imagine such scanners being used in interrogation of criminal suspects or terrorists about their associates. Gur described just such possibilities for national security experts at a recent Penn workshop. "Everything we do, and everything an enemy does, starts in the brain," he said at the Penn meeting, sponsored by the newly formed Institute for Strategic Analysis and Response, which includes Penn epidemiologists, germ-warfare specialists, political scientists, and computer experts. Such scanning could also be used to pick up brain abnormalities that he says characterize those prone to violence.

Another Penn scientist, Daniel Langleben, has found that a functional MRI can act as a lie detector. A handful of other scientists around the country are examining ways to read thoughts by examining the brain.

"In the long term, I think we will have technologies powerful enough to understand what people are thinking in ways unimaginable now," Langleben said. "I think in 50 years we will have a way to essentially read minds." He said he was not particularly happy about that. Neither are others concerned about the unprecedented threat to humanity's most private realm.

Gur acknowledges the concerns about brain scans eventually revealing private thoughts. The balance between security and privacy is something society will have to come to grips with in many areas, he said.

A long quest

To Gur and Langleben, visions of Orwellian thought police do not overshadow the potential benefits and the ever-tantalizing scientific prospect of understanding how the mind works. Gur said this work grew out of a long-standing quest to understand the nature of conscious thought. When he set out to study consciousness, in the 1970s, the concept was so hazy as to be out of the realm of scientific inquiry. With the advent of imaging machines such as MRIs, scientists found the machines were capable of witnessing the brain in action by tracing the way blood flowed to specific regions during various mental tasks. Gur got in early, testing which of the many small structures inside the brain were activated when test subjects were resting, reading words, recognizing shapes, or trying to remember facts.

The early machines used radioactive tracers that would "light up" regions where metabolism was fastest. He went on a long diversion exploring differences between the way men and women used their brains. He found, among other things, that differences in the brain endowed women with better memories and better control of emotions, while men were more likely to be hot-headed. In the last several years, he started focusing on the way the brain responds to emotion. Through a friend at the Arden Theatre Company, he brought together 140 Philadelphia-area actors.

Signs of recognition

He asked them to portray a range of emotions - happiness, sadness, fear, anger and disgust. He took pictures of the actors and showed them to volunteers whose brains were being scanned by a functional MRI, which works by monitoring the way molecules in the brain tissue respond to a magnetic field. He isolated a number of centers in the brain that were activated when the volunteers looked at the emotional faces. Then he decided to show the volunteers faces they had seen before mixed in with new faces, to see if their brains registered recognition.

The familiar faces stimulated more activity than the new ones in several areas, including the hippocampus, which regulates memory, and parts of the visual cortex. He published his findings in the May issue of the journal NeuroImaging.

Investigators have long employed numerous methods to detect lies - voice analysis, observations of body language and facial expressions, and the polygraph, which measures changes in skin conductance and pulse rate. Controversial since its invention, the polygraph fell further out of favor this month when the National Academy of Sciences deemed it too inaccurate for the government to use to screen people as potential security risks.

"The polygraph only catches people who are anxious about lying," often letting through those who lie with ease, Gur said.

Langleben said he was inspired by studying children with attention deficit disorder. He noticed that such children often had trouble telling fibs - they would just blurt out whatever came into their minds first, which was usually the truth. That led him to wonder whether the part of the brain that helps control behavior also helped people to lie.

He found himself collaborating with Gur, who shared his interest.

They started with a standard test - called the "guilty knowledge test," used in polygraph studies. Volunteers were asked to choose a playing card and put it in an envelope along with a $20 bill. The subjects were hooked up to the scanner and asked a series of yes or no questions about the identity of the card. They were told they would get the $20 if they could fool the computer.

When the subjects lied, the scanner showed increased activity in several areas, including one called the anterior cingulate region, which Gur said was activated by conflicting information or errors. Also activated more in lying was a part of the frontal cortex normally involved in making decisions. Finally, the researchers also saw more activity in the part of the brain that controls the right hand - since volunteers had to communicate their answer by pushing buttons.

The scientists still cannot tell when each individual is lying - they only get significant results when they average results from many subjects. But they say they are getting closer to the ultimate goal of lie-detecting: being able to tell individual truths from lies - and truth-tellers from liars.


Informant: Ernie Vega






United States Patent: Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors


has a "Query" bar in which "6,506,148" may be typed. That leads to a description of a new technology patent, which allows manipulation of the human central nervous system via broadcast television signals, DVD, and computer terminal. Scrolling to "Summary" gives some details.


Informant: Donna


by Tim Rifat http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1348227/

Informant: Iris Atzmon

Omega Links:



The Mind Controllers - Hidden Mysteries


What's on your Mind?


Microchip Mind Control, Implants And Cybernetics


MindNet Archive Index

Mind Control in the U.K.

Microwave Mind Control Symptoms & Published Evidence


Do Microwave Weapons Kill?

Come fry with me

Targeting the Human with Directed Energy Weapons


Users Status

You are not logged in.






Recent Updates

Government Accidentally...
https://www.popularmechani cs.com/military/weapons/a1 9855256/muckrock-foia-psyc ho-electric-weapons/?fbcli d=IwAR2NGAxgC2ektJeI0O6zae zxu9va-u3nSIBMOIu3sS_at_id JXvTQOh63pI http://www. mindcontrol-blog.com:8091/ helma/twoday/mindcontrol/s earch?q=weapon
rudkla - 17. Oct, 10:18
Military Targeting Civilians...
http://www.newsparadigm.or g/2018/10/04/secret-milita ry-science-of-microwaves-a nd-mind-control/ http:/ /www.mindcontrol-blog.com: 8091/helma/twoday/mindcont rol/search?q=microwave
rudkla - 5. Oct, 09:29
Allgemeine Datenschutzerklärung Durc h die Nutzung...
rudkla - 6. Sep, 22:15
Researcher links diplomats'...
https://groups.google.com/ forum/#!topic/electromagne tic_radiation_victims/yfTJ nW35cSY http://www.mind control-blog.com:8091/helm a/twoday/mindcontrol/searc h?q=radiofrequen http://ww w.mindcontrol-blog.com:809 1/helma/twoday/mindcontrol /search?q=microwave http:/ /www.mindcontrol-blog.com: 8091/helma/twoday/mindcont rol/search?q=radiation
rudkla - 31. Aug, 22:37
http://www.targetedjustice .com http://www.mindcon trol-blog.com:8091/helma/t woday/mindcontrol/search?q =targeted
rudkla - 1. Aug, 10:51


October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
February 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
April 2017
February 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
July 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004


Online for 3039 days
Last update: 17. Oct, 10:18


vi knallgrau GmbH

powered by Antville powered by Helma

xml version of this page

twoday.net AGB

Aktionen - Actions
Beitraege von John Mecca
Beitraege von Alan Van Arsdale
Beitraege von Anna Fubini
Beitraege von anonymous
Beitraege von Axel Brueggemann
Beitraege von Bob Rose
Beitraege von Bob S
Beitraege von Brigitte Althof
Beitraege von Carla
Beitraege von Clare Louise Wehrle
Beitraege von Claus-Peter Gerber
Beitraege von Corey
Beitraege von domega8
... more
Subscribe Weblog